According to EASA-OPS regulations, which of the following statements regarding landing distance for a turbojet-powered aeroplane is correct?
-
A
When determining the maximum allowable landing mass at destination, 60% of the available landing runway length should be taken into account.
-
B
An inoperative anti-skid system has no effect on the required runway length.
-
C
Reverse thrust is one of the factors always taken into account when determining the landing distance required.
-
D
The runway slope shall only be taken into account when it is greater than ± 5%.
Regulation (EU) No 965/2012
CAT.POL.A.230 Landing – dry runways
(a) The landing mass of the aeroplane determined in accordance with point CAT.POL.A.105(a) for the estimated time of landing at the destination aerodrome and at any alternate aerodrome shall allow a full-stop landing from 50 ft above the threshold:
CAT.POL.A.230 Landing – dry runways
(a) The landing mass of the aeroplane determined in accordance with point CAT.POL.A.105(a) for the estimated time of landing at the destination aerodrome and at any alternate aerodrome shall allow a full-stop landing from 50 ft above the threshold:
(1) for turbojet-powered aeroplanes, within 60% of the landing distance available (LDA);
(2) for turbopropeller-powered aeroplanes, within 70% of the LDA;
(3) by way of derogation from points (a)(1) and (a)(2), for aeroplanes that are approved for reduced landing distance operations under point CAT.POL.A.255, within 80% of the LDA.
(2) for turbopropeller-powered aeroplanes, within 70% of the LDA;
(3) by way of derogation from points (a)(1) and (a)(2), for aeroplanes that are approved for reduced landing distance operations under point CAT.POL.A.255, within 80% of the LDA.
Your Notes (not visible to others)
This question has appeared on the real examination, you can find the related countries below.
-
Portugal2
Use Keyboard Shortcuts
Use your keyboard for faster navigation
